[Mondrian] Publishing an olap4j release to maven central

[Julian Hyde]

I hear your concerns about Mondrian.

However, let’s focus on olap4j for now. Let’s prove that a community can come together to make releases, fix bugs, and establish a roadmap. 

Julian

> On Mar 22, 2016, at 10:57 AM, Adam Brusselback <adambrusselback at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> +2. When starting out, trying to understand the whole ecosystem was a nightmare due to everything you both listed.  
> 
> Finding relevant info on Mondrian is no small feat.  Figuring out which features are new for Mondrian 4, what I should be doing now, vs what's outdated... makes your head spin.  I also find it kinda crazy that one of the main users of Mondrian other than Pentaho themselves has to maintain his own fork which actually integrates the requests the Mondrian project doesn't (at least in a timely manner).  Seems like they do need some more developer time spent on it, because from an outsiders perspective, it looks very unloved.
> 
> On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 10:14 AM, Manuel Aristarán <manuel at jazzido.com <mailto:manuel at jazzido.com>> wrote:
> > On Mar 20, 2016, at 6:19 PM, Tom Barber <tom at analytical-labs.com <mailto:tom at analytical-labs.com>> wrote:
> >
> > Mondrian as well, no one has a clue whats going on, Mondrian 3, Mondrian 4, 60 open pull requests etc, that's not a dig at the guys in the towers, but we run our own Mondrian 4 fork mostly because stuff gets pushed up to PR and never ingested, although i'm guilty of not pushing a few tweaks back which I'll attempt to get done this week. Also there's no feedback either WRT roadmap, targets etc, the problem with Mondrian is its a complex beast and lacking developer power, and then to compound it all there are now 2 major versions of that complex beast! :)
> 
> +1 to this. Being a newcomer [1] to the Pentaho/Mondrian open source ecosystem, it took me quite a while to get used to things being spread across Sourceforce, Github, Jira, the users forum and this listserv, among other resources.
> 
> Also, having both major versions of Mondrian properly released to Maven wouldn't hurt.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> [1] https://github.com/jazzido/mondrian-rest <https://github.com/jazzido/mondrian-rest>
> 
> —
> Manuel Aristarán <manuel at jazzido.com <mailto:manuel at jazzido.com>>
> http://jazzido.com <http://jazzido.com/>
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Mondrian mailing list
> Mondrian at pentaho.org <mailto:Mondrian at pentaho.org>
> http://lists.pentaho.org/mailman/listinfo/mondrian <http://lists.pentaho.org/mailman/listinfo/mondrian>
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Mondrian mailing list
> Mondrian at pentaho.org
> http://lists.pentaho.org/mailman/listinfo/mondrian

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.pentaho.org/pipermail/mondrian/attachments/20160325/b0e51e93/attachment.html