[Mondrian] Mondrian 4 cleanups

[Jonathan Rand]

I'm curious, was ANTLR considered for Mondrian?  I don't know enough to say
one parser is better than the other but the project I'm working on uses
ANTLR and we're generally happy with it. As I said, not suggesting a
change, just interested in hearing other experiences.

Jon Rand
 On Oct 8, 2012 6:10 PM, "Michele Rossi" <michele.rossi at gmail.com> wrote:

> My mistake then, I assumed that you only needed javacup as a transitive
> dependency of olap4j.
>
> I guess my next brilliant idea is that it would make sense to adopt javacc
> in olap4j too.
>
> Thanks,
> Michele
>
> Sent from my iPad
>
> On 8 Oct 2012, at 23:57, Julian Hyde <jhyde at pentaho.com> wrote:
>
> > On Oct 8, 2012, at 12:39 AM, Michele Rossi <michele.rossi at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> >> I thought I'd point point that you're still using Olap4j-1.0.1.500 in
> mondrian-lagunitas and that still depends on the javacup parser.
> >> JavaCC was introduced in Olap4j from version 1.0.1-SNAPSHOT or svn
> revision 540.
> >>
> >> It would probably make sense to take that latest build of olap4j to get
> rid of javacup all together.
> >
> > The parsers are independent from each other. So olap4j could continue to
> use the JavaCUP parser even though Mondrian now uses JavaCC.
> >
> > But yes, it makes sense for mondrian-4 to move to the latest olap4j. I
> will do that in the next day or two.
> >
> > Julian
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Mondrian mailing list
> > Mondrian at pentaho.org
> > http://lists.pentaho.org/mailman/listinfo/mondrian
> _______________________________________________
> Mondrian mailing list
> Mondrian at pentaho.org
> http://lists.pentaho.org/mailman/listinfo/mondrian
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.pentaho.org/pipermail/mondrian/attachments/20121008/bfcf76fc/attachment.html