[Mondrian] Multiple sets in where clause

Paul Stoellberger p.stoellberger at gmail.com
Thu May 3 15:07:25 EDT 2012


i always use aggregated members with (member,member) or union( (member,member), (member, member))

working with sets in the where clause appears to be a bit unstable too. i noticed some wrong results using them (cant recall the details) and aggregated members always worked fine for me




Am 03.05.2012 um 18:30 schrieb Pedro Alves <pmgalves at gmail.com>:

> Bah - from http://jira.pentaho.com/browse/MONDRIAN-555 I take it it's a 
> no? :S
> 
> On Thu 03 May 2012 05:27:34 PM WEST, Pedro Alves wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> Is it supported without ussing calculated (aggregated) members?
>> 
>> 
>> Where <set> works.
>> 
>> where (<member>,<member>) works
>> 
>> where ( <set> * <set> works but this isn't a very optimal approach.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> I feel I'm missing something very very obvious
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -pedro
> _______________________________________________
> Mondrian mailing list
> Mondrian at pentaho.org
> http://lists.pentaho.org/mailman/listinfo/mondrian


More information about the Mondrian mailing list