[Mondrian] problems with concurrency (shepherd) execution
Paul Stoellberger
p.stoellberger at gmail.com
Tue Oct 18 05:32:27 EDT 2011
I filed it as http://jira.pentaho.com/browse/MONDRIAN-1014
Is the monitoring refactoring part of 3.3?
-Paul
On Oct 18, 2011, at 9:02 AM, Julian Hyde wrote:
>
> On Oct 17, 2011, at 6:01 AM, Paul Stoellberger wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> some users have report the below pasted bug when using saiku (mondrian 3.3-SNAPSHOT). it doesn't always appear, just sometimes.... and in some environments... i couldnt find a clear path to reproduce the problem...
>
> I think I've seen a similar problem -- so even though it's not consistently reproducible, I'm sure there's a bug here. Can you log it please.
>
> I might have fixed it in my current set of changes for monitoring. (I had to do quite a bit of work on connection/statement/execution lifecycle.) But it's still good to have it logged.
>
>> My assumption is, since statement.end() is called in RolapConnection:642 (see stacktrace) that in case of an error StatementImpl throws an error because the execution hasn't finished
>>
>> What confuses me as well in MondrianOlap4jStatement is that this.execution is never set. only in start() and in there i cant see how that would ever work by just using that
>
> I think start() is OK. It first ensures that the statement is not already executing, then marks it as executing by setting the 'execution' field.
>
> But I can't think what might be cause right now.
>
> Julian
> _______________________________________________
> Mondrian mailing list
> Mondrian at pentaho.org
> http://lists.pentaho.org/mailman/listinfo/mondrian
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.pentaho.org/pipermail/mondrian/attachments/20111018/b5c11515/attachment-0001.html
More information about the Mondrian
mailing list