[Mondrian] Re: Build failed in Hudson: mondrian #627
jhyde at pentaho.com
Tue Feb 24 02:50:11 EST 2009
PS I agree that in general we sholdn't be issuing multiple jars with the
same version number.
From: mondrian-bounces at pentaho.org [mailto:mondrian-bounces at pentaho.org] On
Behalf Of Julian Hyde
Sent: Monday, February 23, 2009 12:52 PM
To: Aaron Phillips
Subject: [Mondrian] Re: Build failed in Hudson: mondrian #627
Yup. Same source, just one file duplicated in the jar.
On Feb 23, 2009, at 12:29 PM, Aaron Phillips <aphillips at pentaho.com> wrote:
Am I understanding correctly that you have redeployed olap4j with the same
version of 0.9.7.145?
Normally I would not recommend that, especially if the contents are
different source-wise. I can understand if the jar was improperly built
I will purge the ivy cache of olap4j jars and poke the Mondrian build.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Mondrian