[Mondrian] Re: Build failed in Hudson: mondrian #627

Julian Hyde jhyde at pentaho.com
Tue Feb 24 02:50:11 EST 2009

PS I agree that in general we sholdn't be issuing multiple jars with the
same version number.


From: mondrian-bounces at pentaho.org [mailto:mondrian-bounces at pentaho.org] On
Behalf Of Julian Hyde
Sent: Monday, February 23, 2009 12:52 PM
To: Aaron Phillips
Cc: Mondrian
Subject: [Mondrian] Re: Build failed in Hudson: mondrian #627

Yup. Same source, just one file duplicated in the jar.

On Feb 23, 2009, at 12:29 PM, Aaron Phillips <aphillips at pentaho.com> wrote:

Am I understanding correctly that you have redeployed olap4j with the same
version of
Normally I would not recommend that, especially if the contents are
different source-wise.  I can understand if the jar was improperly built
I will purge the ivy cache of olap4j jars and poke the Mondrian build.


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.pentaho.org/pipermail/mondrian/attachments/20090223/7a00600d/attachment.html 

More information about the Mondrian mailing list