[Mondrian] Recap - that bug is already there and opposite decisiontaken
julianhyde at speakeasy.net
Thu Mar 1 20:30:19 EST 2007
I confess I had forgotten about that bug.
But the bugs aren't entirely contradictory:
id=35302&atid=414613> bug 1403220 says that the behavior of the ':'
function when one of the endpoints evaluates to NULL should be to return
the empty set; and that Richard should create a testcase for that
id=35302&atid=414613> says that the ':' should allow the NULL literal
as its end-points (plus some stuff about semantics which is inconsistent
Let's keep the semantics of ':' the same, as stated in 1403220, for now.
From: mondrian-bounces at pentaho.org [mailto:mondrian-bounces at pentaho.org]
On Behalf Of michael bienstein
Sent: Thursday, March 01, 2007 3:13 AM
To: Mondrian developer mailing list; mondrian-devel
Subject: [Mondrian] Recap - that bug is already there and opposite
Look at bug 1403220. The decision was to keep current Mondrian
behaviour and not align with MS behaviour. Maybe a property for this?
Découvrez une nouvelle façon d'obtenir des réponses à toutes vos
questions ! Profitez des connaissances, des opinions et des expériences
des internautes sur Yahoo!
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Mondrian