[Mondrian] Recap - that bug is already there and opposite decisiontaken

Julian Hyde julianhyde at speakeasy.net
Thu Mar 1 20:30:19 EST 2007


I confess I had forgotten about that bug.
 
But the bugs aren't entirely contradictory:

*	

	
<http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1403220&group_
id=35302&atid=414613> bug 1403220 says that the behavior of the ':'
function when one of the endpoints evaluates to NULL should be to return
the empty set; and that Richard should create a testcase for that
behavior, whereas
*	

	bug
<http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1671613&group_
id=35302&atid=414613> 1671613
<http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1671613&group_
id=35302&atid=414613>  says that the ':' should allow the NULL literal
as its end-points (plus some stuff about semantics which is inconsistent
with 1403220).

Let's keep the semantics of ':' the same, as stated in 1403220, for now.
 
Julian


  _____  

From: mondrian-bounces at pentaho.org [mailto:mondrian-bounces at pentaho.org]
On Behalf Of michael bienstein
Sent: Thursday, March 01, 2007 3:13 AM
To: Mondrian developer mailing list; mondrian-devel
Subject: [Mondrian] Recap - that bug is already there and opposite
decisiontaken


Ahem,

Look at bug 1403220.  The decision was to keep current Mondrian
behaviour and not align with MS behaviour.  Maybe a property for this?

Michael


  _____  

Découvrez une nouvelle façon d'obtenir des réponses à toutes vos
questions ! Profitez des connaissances, des opinions et des expériences
des internautes sur Yahoo!
<http://fr.rd.yahoo.com/evt=42054/*http://fr.answers.yahoo.com>
Questions/Réponses.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.pentaho.org/pipermail/mondrian/attachments/20070301/6e51372a/attachment.html 


More information about the Mondrian mailing list